Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sullenberger v. City of Coral Gables et al
as 1:2022cv21830
Plaintiff:
Simon Gerald Sullenberger
Defendant:
City of Coral Gables, Jorge Puga, Natalie Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isabel Flores-Portillo v. U.S. Attorney General
as 20-13775
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ISABEL NATALY FLORES-PORTILLO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 6.584 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00244
Defendant:
BETTY ANZALDUA, Ariana Pitalua, Maria Rosario Cavazos and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Jose Alfredo Cavazos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Flores v. Diamond Perfection Inc., et al.
as 1:2018cv01315
Defendant:
Aqua Finance Inc., Diamond Perfection Inc., Does 1-10 inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11743
Plaintiff:
Lillian Chandler , Patricia Coffey , Margueritt Davis and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Lace Entertainment, Inc
as 17-170
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Romanchenko, Natalie Flores, Christine Munoz and others
Petitioner:
MLB Enterprises, Corporation and Anthony Capeci
Respondent:
Jaqueline Gomez, Individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated and Yashiro Currasco, Individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
Glen Orecchio and Monica Gomez
Franks v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
as 8:2014cv02838
Defendant:
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
Plaintiff:
Natalie Flores
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Flores v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00393
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Natalie Flores
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
