Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nathan Hunter v. USDC-CAFR
as 22-70241
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATHAN HUNTER, FISHER, Correctional Officer, CHI, Correctional Officer and others
Petitioner:
NATHAN HUNTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
(PC) Hunter v. Rosales et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hunter
Defendant:
I. Rosales, R. Volker, C. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19409
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNTER v. JAMISON et al
as 1:2020cv01253
Respondent:
WARDEN J.L. JAMISON and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
NATHAN HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HUNTER v. JAMISON et al
as 1:2019cv03463
Defendant:
CLARENCE THOMAS, U.S. SENATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATURE and SEVEN JUSTICES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff:
DARRYL M. MCGUIRE
Respondent:
J.L JAMISON and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
NATHAN HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Hunter v. Fisher et al
as 1:2019cv00625
Defendant:
Thompson, F. Senfuma, Chi and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Herrera et al
as 1:2017cv01163
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hunter
Defendant:
G. Herrera, M. Martinez, T. Priest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Hunter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00662
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Hunter and Nathan Hunter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. et al
as 3:2009cv00629
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hunter and Nathan Hunter
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
