Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Montenegro v. Quaterman et al
as 4:2019cv03132
Defendant: Nathaniel Quaterman, Rick Thaler and Lorie Davis
Plaintiff: Jorge Montenegro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorge v. Quaterman et al
as 4:2016cv03360
Plaintiff: Montenegro Jorge
Defendant: Nathaniel Quaterman and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Nathaniel Quarterman et al
as 3:2010cv00119
Plaintiff: James Miles Davis
Defendant: Nathaniel Quaterman and FSG Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Livingston et al
as 1:2009cv00256
Petitioner: Alvaro Sanchez
Respondent: Brad Livingston, Nathaniel Quaterman, Cameron County Community Supervisor of Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights None
Locke v. Quaterman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00262
Petitioner: Robert Wayne Locke
Respondent: Nathaniel Quaterman and Parole Board Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Locke v. Quaterman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv00389
Petitioner: Robert Wayne Locke
Respondent: Nathaniel Quaterman and Parole Board Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buster v. Quaterman
as 1:2009cv00611
Petitioner: Thomas Earl Buster
Respondent: Nathaniel Quaterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Revels v. Faris et al
as 2:2009cv00122
Plaintiff: Kevin Lynn Revels
Defendant: Klaa Faris, Nathaniel Quaterman and Tommy Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bautista v. Quaterman
as 1:2009cv00039
Petitioner: Rosalino Bautista
Respondent: Nathaniel Quaterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trevino v. Quaterman
as 6:2008cv00063
Petitioner: Richard Trevino, .
Respondent: Nathaniel Quaterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?