Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA/CSS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1191
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD GRENELL, in his official capacity as acting Director of National Intelligence, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/ CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE and others
Plaintiff: THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, PEN AMERICAN CENTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION
Pierce v. L.A. Times-Washington Post et al
as 6:2016cv00361
Plaintiff: Seavon Pierce
Defendant: L.A. Times-Washington Post, U.S. News & World Report, International Herald Tribune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Sacramento Business Journal, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02690
Plaintiff: Seavon Pierce
Defendant: Sacramento Business Journal, law.com, Inc., USA Today and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elizabeth Heibrink, et al v. Thinkdirect Marketing Group, et al
as 15-15612
Plaintiff - Appellant: L. ROXANA MARION, on behalf of herself and all others, ELIZABETH HEIDBRINK, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and CONNIE MCLAUGHLIN
Interested Party - Appellant: DENISE PALMER, FELICIA CLARK, JAMES RHOADES and others
Defendant - Appellee: THINKDIRECT MARKETING GROUP, INC., a.k.a. Agora Marketing Solutions, Inc., a.k.a. Special Data Processing Corporation, a.k.a. National Magazine Exchange, DENNIS CAHILL, individually, DAVE MACEY, individually and others
: SERVICE
Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA/CSS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2560
Plaintiff - Appellant: WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH and others
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/ CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE, ADMIRAL MICHAEL S. ROGERS, in his official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE and others
Wikimedia Foundation et al v. National Security Agency/Central Security Service et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00662
Plaintiff: Wikimedia Foundation , National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys , Human Rights Watch and others
Defendant: National Security Agency/Central Security Service , Michael S. Rogers , Office of the Director of National Intelligence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Amnesty International USA et al v. McConnell et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv06259
Plaintiff: Amnesty International USA, Amnesty International USA, Amnesty International USA and others
Defendant: John M. McConnell, Keith B. Alexander, Keith B. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crain Communications et al v. Magazine Billing Services et al
as 2:2008mc00181
Plaintiff: Crain Communications, Crain Communications, Crain Management Services and others
Defendant: Magazine Payment Services, Publishers Clearing Emporium, Publishers Processing Service and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Azubuko v. National Magazine We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2003cv00029
Plaintiff: Chukwuma E Azubuko
Defendant: National Magazine Exchange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ctr Natl Sec Studies, et al v. DOJ
as 02-5254
Plaintiff / Appellee: Center for National Security Studies, American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center and others
Not Yet Classified: The Washington Post Company, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Press Club and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae: Washington Legal Foundation and The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?