Cases 31 - 40 of 56
REGALADO et al v. ROYERS et al
as 5:2012cv03773
Plaintiff:
VICTOR REGALADO , ANAYELI LOPEZ , AMADOR LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
ELIZABETH ROYERS , NATIONAL FREIGHT, INC. and WALMART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roe et al v. McCutcheon et al
as 4:2012cv01251
Plaintiff:
David Roe and Terry Roe
Defendant:
Willie McCutcheon and National Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROWELL et al v. THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02294
Plaintiff:
RONALD ROWELL and JOANN ROWELL
Defendant:
THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC., NATIONAL FREIGHT, INC., KEVIN MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Layton et al v. National Freight, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
David Layton and Sandy Layton
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lizzi v. National Freight, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01180
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lizzi
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc., NFI Interactive Logistics and Aiman Abdeljalil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bielecki v. National Freight, Inc.
as 9:2010cv00095
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven E Bielecki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Percaill et al
as 8:2010cv01243
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Williams
Defendant:
Kelvin P. Percaill and National Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abernathy v. Putnam et al
as 1:2010cv00646
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Abernathy
Defendant:
Michael Putnam, National Freight, Inc. and Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nava-Cruz v. National Freight, Inc. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER (10cv0823)
as 4:2010cv01879
Plaintiff:
Saul Nava-Cruz
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc. and Noe Lee Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rocha et al v. National Freight, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00823
Plaintiff:
Raul Rocha and Efrain Fernandez
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc. and Noe Lee Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
