Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35414
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, STATE OF MONTANA, AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae: ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
Northern Plains, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 20-35412
Plaintiff / Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, BOLD ALLIANCE, NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN GAS ASSOCIATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Defendant / Appellant: TODD T. SEMONITE, In his official capacity and U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Amicus Curiae: ENERGY EQUIPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE, ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, AND 17 OTHER STATES (TEXAS, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH DAKOTA, AND UTAH) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00492
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RICKMAN v. NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION et al
as 3:2019cv18266
Defendant: NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, HARNEY ELECTRICAL COOPERATIVE, INC. and THE NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION'S GROUP BENEFITS PROGRAM
Plaintiff: WENDY RICKMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Intravaia et al v. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association et al
as 1:2019cv00973
Defendant: National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and Insurance and Financial Services Committee
Plaintiff: Thaddius Intravaia and Steven Marvik
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
American Public Power Assoc, et al v. FERC
as 19-1147
Petitioner: American Municipal Power, Inc., American Public Power Association, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Greene v. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00295
Defendant: National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Disability Management Services, Inc., Rutherford Electric Membership Corp. and others
Plaintiff: James W. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Carpenter v. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association et al
as 1:2018cv00329
Defendant: National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Cooperative Benefit Administrators, Inc. and Raft River Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Plaintiff: Heber Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Utility Water Act Group et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00206
Plaintiff: Utility Water Act Group , National Rural Electric Cooperative Association , National Association of Home Builders and others
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, Wilbur Ross, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
McDonald v. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association Group Benefits Program
as 2:2017cv01178
Plaintiff: William B McDonald
Defendant: National Rural Electric Cooperative Association Group Benefits Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?