Cases 21 - 30 of 50
SCHULTZ v. U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
KIRK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ALAN W. ANDERSON, MINDY E. WEINSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHULTZ v. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
KIRK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, FBI HEADQUARTERS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHULTZ v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION et al
as 1:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
KIRK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION, GREGORY JOHN GUTFELD, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lew Warden v. Allied Insurance et al.
as 2:2016cv07341
Defendant:
Allied Insurance, Amco Insurance, Mark Coffin and others
Plaintiff:
Lew Warden
Warden v. Allied Insurance et al.
as 2:2016cv02264
Plaintiff:
Lew Warden
Defendant:
Allied Insurance, Amco Insurance, Nationwide Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE et al
as 5:2016cv02678
Plaintiff:
NIKA RAET BEY
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE, ALLIED INSURANCE, NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-20624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Riley v. Fidelity Information Services et al
as 3:2015cv02331
Defendant:
Fidelity Information Services, Lender Processing Services Inc, Lps Default Solutions Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
