Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Naylor v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04490
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Naylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Naylor v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2019cv00037
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Naylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDonald et al v. Longley et al
as 1:2019cv00219
Defendant:
Randall O Sorrels, David C Kent, Christy Amuny and others
Plaintiff:
Tony K McDonald, Joshua B Hammer, Mark S Pulliam and others
Petitioner:
Ken Paxton and Goldwater Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Read v. Lorie Naylor
as 19-10167
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIE NAYLOR, CDC2 Court Reporter
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD W. READ
Naylor v. Sollie
as 3:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Leathell Naylor
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Billie Sollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naylor v. Sanofi US Services Inc et al
as 2:2018cv11584
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alberta Naylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Naylor v. Sollie
as 3:2018cv00820
Defendant:
Sheriff Billy Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Vanrique Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naylor v. USA
as 3:2018cv00807
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marvin Naylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Naylor v. Sollie
as 3:2018cv00744
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Naylor
Defendant:
Billie Sollie and Sheriff Billie Sollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naylor v. M.D.O.C.
as 1:2018cv00225
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
M.D.O.C.
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
