Cases 31 - 40 of 116
National Association for Gun Rights et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
National Association for Gun Rights, Patricia Brought and Toni Theresa Spera Flanigan
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Patrick J. Griffin, David R. Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Staton v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, John Bowen, Oullette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Ned Lamont and Devonia Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westry v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Eric Westry
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Ned Lamont, Jeanette Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Lamont
as 22-1027
Plaintiff:
Sean Murphy and Robert Barnes
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Reale
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont
Furst v. Malloy
as 22-730
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joel Ira Furst
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont, Governor, State of Connecticut and William Tong, Attorney General, State of Connecticut
Burke v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Robert Burke
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Angel Quiros, Deidre S. Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inkel v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Phillip Inkel
Defendant:
Ned Lamont and Richard A. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furst v. Obama
as 22-610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joel Ira Furst
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont, Governor and State of Connecticut
Defendant:
Barack Obama, President
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
