Cases 1 - 10 of 65
ISENHOWER v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE et al
as 1:2023cv02228
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RUSSELL ISENHOWER
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, NEIL PROPST, LORA DEATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUONG v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01750
Plaintiff:
MAC TRUONG
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, RODRIC BRAY, TODD HUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
OWENS v. PROPST et al
as 1:2021cv02241
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. OWENS
Defendant:
NEIL D. PROPST, JEFFREY B. BERNFIELD, TERRANCE DICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01705
Plaintiff:
NEIL SHEA
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
STOVALL v. PROPST et al
as 1:2020cv02302
Defendant:
NEIL PROPST and PROPST
Plaintiff:
DANIEL STOVALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGGS v. HILL et al
as 1:2020cv01832
Defendant:
FRIESE, MILAN, COLE and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL P. HIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01626
Defendant:
NANCY MARTHAKIS, MARK CABRERA, KENNETH ROBERTSON and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, INC. et al v. SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 1:2020cv01094
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR, SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE, MAYOR OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN BLAIR, INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, INC., NEIL HUDELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGGS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv00712
Defendant:
FRIESE, MILAN, CURTIS HILL and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL P. HIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
