Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Aldana et al v. Streamline Builders Corp. et al
as 2:2023cv06668
Plaintiff:
Bagner Eduardo Rodriguez Aldana, David Rodriguez Aldana, Jose Luis Diaz Vidal and others
Defendant:
Streamline Builders Corp. d/b/a JR Tree Care, Erika Saltzman and Streamline Builders Corp. doing business as JR Tree Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gonzalez Rodriguez v. Big Spring Flightline Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jose Neri Gonzalez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Big Spring Flightline Correctional Institution, The GEO Group Inc, Bobby Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09553
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02360
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in
Gonzalez v. USA
as 20-40794
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nery Gonzalez, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Gonzalez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2020cv00087
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Nery Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02904
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
International Fidelity Insurance Company v. NG Auto et al
as 2:2017cv01275
Plaintiff:
International Fidelity Insurance Company
Defendant:
NG Auto and Nery Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jose Gonzalez Rodriguez
as 16-50376
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE NERI GONZALEZ RODRIGUEZ
Gonzalez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
Neri Gonzalez and Sergio Gonzalez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
