Cases 1 - 10 of 22
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv12306
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY, T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY and THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Lane County, Oregon
as 6:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, D/B/A AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Lane County, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Incorporated Village of Muttontown et al
as 2:2022cv05524
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Incorporated Village of Muttontown, The Incorporated Village of Muttontown Board of Trustees, The Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Lauren Calabrese, Aldo Calabrese, Tara Rice and others
Intervenor:
Russell McRory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton et al
as 2:2020cv03555
Defendant:
The Town of East Hampton, The Town of East Hampton Building Department, The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Intervenor Defendant:
Peter Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, etal. v. Kootenai County Idaho
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, D/B/A AT&T Mobility, a Delaware LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as A.T. and T. Mobility
Defendant:
Kootenai County Idaho
Intervenor:
Potlatch Hill Neighborhood Group, Alissa Desancic, Joel Bowlby and others
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay et al
as 2:2021cv03201
Defendant:
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay, Planning and Development Department of the Town of Oyster Bay, Town of Oyster Bay, New York and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Town of Heath et al
as 3:2021cv30106
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Town of Heath, Town of Heath Planning Board, Doug Mason and others
Intervenor:
Edward Whitaker, Tara Mason, Kate Peppard and others
Leichter et al v. The Town of East Hampton et al
as 2:2020cv02874
Defendant:
Tim Brenneman, Denise Savarese, Ian Calder-Piedmonte and others
Plaintiff:
MNZI LLC, Pamela Leichter and Anthony Leichter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC et al v. NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 2:2021cv12302
Defendant:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY and T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, v. County of Santa Barbara, California
as 2:2020cv11804
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
County of Santa Barbara, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
