Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, AMY LUEDERS, in her official capacity as Southwest Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, AMY LUEDERS, in her official capacity as Southwest Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, WILDLANDS NETWORK, a non-profit organization and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, MARTHA WILLIAMS, as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
Fenn Farm et al v. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish et al
as 1:2020cv00468
Plaintiff:
Fenn Farm and Three Rivers Cattle, LTD, Co.
Defendant:
Jimmy Bates, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Sharon Salazar Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rancho del Oso Pardo, Inc. et al v. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish et al
as 1:2020cv00427
Defendant:
Jimmy Bates, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Sharon Salazar Hickey and others
Plaintiff:
River Bend Ranch LLC, Rancho del Oso Pardo, Inc. and Chama III, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Darr v. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish
as 1:2018cv00672
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Game and Fish
Plaintiff:
Margaret Darr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Davis et al v. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish et al
as 1:2018cv00415
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Game and Fish , Wyatt Harwell , Benjamin Otero and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Davis and Katrina Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Of Alabama et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2016cv00593
Plaintiff:
State Of Alabama , State of Arkansas , State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Penny Pritzker, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
NM Game & Fish Dept. v. DOI, et al
as 16-2202
Petitioner - Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
Respondent - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Defendant Intervenor:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
NM Dept. of Game and Fish v. DOI, et al
as 16-2189
Petitioner - Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Defendant Intervenor - Appellant:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
