Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Newell v. Newby et al
as 5:2022ct03091
Plaintiff:
Jonathan James Newell
Defendant:
Paul Newby, Linda McGee, Marion Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Funderburk et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dan Bishop
Defendant:
Amy L Funderburk, Paul Newby, Robin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUMMINGS v. MORTON et al
as 1:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. CUMMINGS, SOCORRITO VERONICA CUMMINGS and INTERLUDE HISTORIC LLC
Defendant:
C.M. MORTON, CRYSTAL M. RICHARDSON, LISA JOHNSON-TONKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belton v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2019ct03174
Defendant:
County of Wake, John P. Newby, Jr. and State of North Carolina
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hilton Belton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sealed Defendant v. USA
as 4:2016cv00161
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Martrey Antwain Newby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sealed Defendant v. USA
as 4:2012cv00042
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Martrey Antwain Newby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newby v. USA
as 5:2011cv00383
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Newby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MORRIS v. THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, et al
as 1:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE MORRIS, SR.
Defendant:
THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, JUDGES, ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
