Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ROSARIO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SECRETARY, DR. LAUREL HARRY, DEPUTY SECRETARY TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL et al v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01516
Plaintiff:
XAVIAR PAGAN, RONNIE E. JOHNSON, COURTNEY DUNCAN and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE M. LITTLE, SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, DEPUTY SECRETARY TREVOR WINGARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SUMEY et al v. ABDULLAH et al
as 2:2020cv01126
Plaintiff:
SUSAN SUMEY and NEWTON E. SUMEY, JR.
Defendant:
SAID MOHAMMED ABDULLAH and EAGLE TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00803
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
ASBURY et al v. EQT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv01005
Plaintiff:
RONALD AND TRACY LOVRICH, DONALD AND JULIA NEWTON, JOSEPH AND AMY HEBDA and others
Defendant:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P., EQT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
SPOTZ v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00262
Petitioner:
MARK NEWTON SPOTZ
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and ROBERT GILMORE
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. SHAW, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
