Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Akeem Fuller, et al v. Warren County, OH Educational Service Center, et al
as 22-3228
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AKEEM FULLER, NICK EVANS and MARK LINQUIST
Defendant / Appellant:
WARREN COUNTY, OH EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER, TOM ISAACS, Superintendent of the Warren County, OH Educational Service Center, PAT PARE, Senior Executive Director of the Warren County, OH Educational Service Center and others
Fuller et al v. Warren County Educational Service Center et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Plaintiff:
Mark Linquist, Akeem Fuller and Nick Evans
Defendant:
Tom Isaacs, Warren County Educational Service Center, Pat Par and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAGWOOD v. Kern County et al
as 1:2018at00591
Plaintiff:
RHONDA HAGWOOD
Defendant:
Kern County, NICK EVANS, TODD NEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagwood v. Kern County et al
as 1:2018cv01092
Defendant:
Todd Newell, Kern County and Nick Evans
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Hagwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Coon v. Reveal Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv05191
Defendant:
Reveal Labs, Inc. and Nick Evans
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Coon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coon v. Reveal Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00667
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Coon
Defendant:
Nick Evans and Reveal Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Jefferson v. Evans, et al
as 2:2011cv02174
Plaintiff:
Terry L Jefferson
Defendant:
Nick Evans, Stephen Nadell, Seattle Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds v. Getty et al
as 2:2007cv00317
Plaintiff:
Richard B Edmonds, Richard B Edmonds, Richard B Edmonds and others
Defendant:
Mark H Getty, Mark H Getty, Jonathan D Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
