Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4240
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO PEREZ-PEREZ, MIKE ESTIBEN PEREZ-BARRERA, AURY FABIOLA BARRERA-GODOY and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barghouti v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50327
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy, Susan Tuell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs et al v. The Journal Publishing Company et al
as 1:2021cv00690
Plaintiff:
Michael Jacobs and Ruby Handler Jacobs
Defendant:
The Journal Publishing Company doing business as The Albuquerque Journal, William P. Lang, Nicole Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Zanassi v. Saul
as 5:2021cv01106
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Nicole Perez Zanassi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sauermilch Perez v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2020cv00416
Plaintiff:
Tanya Nicole Sauermilch Perez and Tanya Nicole Perez Sauermilch
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Lancaster County and Lincoln Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez et al v. FCA USA LLC
as 2:2019cv13510
Defendant:
John Does 1-100 and FCA USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Nicole Perez, I. D. and Kenneth Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez et al v. FCA USA LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03225
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, FCA USA LLC and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
Plaintiff:
Nicole Perez, Isabella Duran and Kenneth Duran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicole Perez Krueger v. Equifax, Inc.
as 2:2018cv01402
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicole Perez-Krueger
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
