Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Singleton v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2019cv03133
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Singleton
Defendant:
Jonathan Henson, Cortez Mason, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Cotton et al v. Walden et al
as 2:2019cv00901
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc, Jerry Glen Walden and Christopher Thomas James
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Cotton and Keith Richard Cotton
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Thomas v. Norfolk Southrn Railway Company
as 1:2019cv02043
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Rufus Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CARMAN v. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILROAD COMPANY et al
as 4:2018cv00203
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, J C BROCKMAN, SHANE KEYS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D CARMAN
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Guinn v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2018cv03119
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Kathy Guinn
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Horton v. Norfolk Southern Railway Comapny Inc et al
as 5:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thomas Horton
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc, Ascend Performance Materials Inc , Ascend Performance Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
O'NEAL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2016cv00519
Plaintiff:
PHILIP O'NEAL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deason v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 4:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
John Deason
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company , Cleco Corporation , Dwayne Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Skipworth v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Stanley Skipworth
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MCMICHAEL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
JASON G MCMICHAEL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
