Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Barnes v. Everett et al
as 5:2012ct03194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
William Everett, Pitt County Government, Pitt County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Pitt County Government et al
as 5:2012ct03185
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Pitt County Government, North Carolina State Government, Greenville Municipal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. North Carolina State Bar, et al
as 5:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
Michael H. McGee
Defendant:
North Carolina State Bar , State of North Carolina, L. Thomas Lunsford, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. North Carolina State Bar Office of Counsel et al
as 5:2011cv00415
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Price
Defendant:
North Carolina State Bar Office of Counsel, Adam Moyers, Frank Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willie Gilbert, II v. The North Carolina State Bar
as 09-2193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE D. GILBERT, II
Defendant - Appellee:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR and A. ROOT EDMONDSON, individually and in his official capacity as an agent of the North Carolina State Bar
Gilbert v. The North Carolina State Bar et al
as 5:2009cv00382
Defendant:
The North Carolina State Bar and A. Root Edmonson
Plaintiff:
Willie Gilbert
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Gilbert v. The North Carolina State Bar et al
as 5:2009cv00383
Defendant:
The North Carolina State Bar and A. Root Edmonson
Plaintiff:
Willie Gilbert
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
ARBREP.COM, et at v. THE COUNCILORS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR
as 1:2007cv00246
Plaintiff:
ARBREP.COM and GERALD COLLETTE
Defendant:
THE COUNCILORS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR and AN UNKNOWN NUMBER OF UNIDENTIFIED AGENTS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
