Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Aviva PLC et al v. Honeywell International Inc.
as 1:2023cv07373
Counter Defendant:
Aviva PLC, Commercial Union Assurance Company Limited, NRG Victory Reinsurance Limited and others
Plaintiff:
The Ocean Marine Insurance Company Limited and The Yorkshire Insurance Company Limited
Counter Claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
In re Debtor Lakeland Development Company
as 2:2018cv01084
Cross Defendant:
Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, Employers Surplus Lines Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Central National Insurance Company of Omaha, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Certain London Market Insurance Companies, Goodman Santa Fe Springs SPE LLC and Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Counter Claimant:
Certain London Market Insurance Companies and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cross Claimant:
Certain London Market Insurance Companies and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
In Re Debtor:
Lakeland Development Company
Counter Defendant:
Jason M. Rund
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Rund
Earl Adams, Jr., et al v. Chevron USA, Incorporated, et al
as 15-31091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EARL A. ADAMS, JR., ALFRED ALEXANDER, JENELL ANTOINE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH F. GREFER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, BISHOPSGATE INSURANCE LIMITED and others
Earl Adams, Jr., et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Incorporated, et al
as 15-90113
Plaintiff - Respondent:
EARL A. ADAMS, JR., ALFRED ALEXANDER, PAUL J. ARMAND and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
JOSEPH F. GREFER
Defendant - Respondent:
CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, BISHOPSGATE INSURANCE LIMITED and others
The Port of Port Angeles v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
as 3:2015cv05180
Plaintiff:
The Port of Port Angeles
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London , British Law Insurance Company Ltd , Commercial Union Assurance Company P.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
San Diego Gas and Electric Company v. Northern Assurance Company of America et al
as 3:2015cv00636
Plaintiff:
San Diego Gas and Electric Company
Defendant:
Northern Assurance Company of America , Continental Insurance Company , Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited and others
Cross_claimant:
Continental Insurance Company , Northern Assurance Company of America and Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited
Cross_defendant:
Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited , Northern Assurance Company of America and Continental Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Continental Insurance Company and Northern Assurance Company of America
Counter_defendant:
San Diego Gas and Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brawner Builders, Inc. v. Northern Assurance Company
as 14-1787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAWNER BUILDERS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
OneBeacon America Insurance Company et al v. National Casualty Company et al
as 1:2014cv12570
Petitioner:
OneBeacon America Insurance Company , Employers Commercial Union Insurance Company , Employers Liability Assurance Corpoartion, Ltd. (US Branch) and others
Respondent:
National Casualty Company and Employers Insurance Company of Wausau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyman Morse Boatbuilding Inc. v. Northern Assurance Co.
as 14-1438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYMAN MORSE BOATBUILDING INC. and CABOT LYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Lyman Morse Boatbuilding Inc., et al v. Northern Assurance Co.
as 14-1380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LYMAN MORSE BOATBUILDING INC. and CABOT LYMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
