Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Midgett v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
as 8:2019cv02970
Defendant:
CACI, Teledyne, General Atomics and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniel Midgett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibson v. Northrop Grummann Systems Corp et al
as 2:2017cv00845
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gibson
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Systems Corp and Northrop Grumman Technical Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northrop Grumman Technical Ser v. DynCorp International LLC
as 16-1644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC
Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc. v. DynCorp International LLC
as 1:2016cv00534
Plaintiff:
Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc.
Defendant:
DynCorp International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Midgett v. Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniel Midgett
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Flynn et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv03908
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Flynn and Marie Esther (Flynn) Soord
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda North America, Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2011cv00690
Plaintiff:
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
MISSION ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL, LLC , LINC GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC , GLOBAL LINGUISTIC SOLUTIONS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
