Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jude v. Nuckles et al
as 7:2018cv00113
Defendant:
Danny W. Nuckles and Roger E. Daniels
Plaintiff:
Charlie Jude
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2435
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mark Pisciotta v. Township Of Grand Blanc, et al
as 14-2394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK EDWARD PISCIOTTA
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF GRAND BLANC, GENESEE, COUNTY OF, DAVID STAMM and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE BUCHANAN, Sergeant, PATRICK FULLER, Deputy and TERRY COCKING, Deputy
Nuckles v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21043
Plaintiff:
Barbara Nuckles
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Danny Blair v. Patricia Barnhart, et al
as 11-1111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY BLAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA BARNHART, O CARTER, L FEATHERSTONE and others
Nuckles et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 2:2009cv00236
Plaintiff:
Brad Nuckles, Brad Nuckles, Ryan Lawson and others
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association and Collegiate Licenxing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nuckles et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 2:2009cv00235
Plaintiff:
Brad Nuckles, Brad Nuckles, Brad Nuckles and others
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association and Collegiate Licensing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Blair v. Barnhart et al
as 2:2008cv11626
Plaintiff:
Danny Blair
Defendant:
Patricia Barnhart, O Carter, L Featherstone and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Mulazim, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 2:2000cv71209
Plaintiff:
Fa'Dee Mulazim and Melanic Radination Zonex Department
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections , Bill Martin, Dan Bolden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
