Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Crespo v. Smart Health Diagnostics Company et al
as 5:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
Carlo Crespo
Defendant:
Smart Health Diagnostics Company and Matthew Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nunez v. Huntsville, City of
as 5:2023cv01397
Plaintiff:
Don Nunez
Defendant:
Huntsville, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 5:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Don Nunez
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Madison County Metro Jail and Huntsville Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCrory v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 1:2021cv00496
Plaintiff:
Danielle Marie McCrory
Petitioner:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Defendant:
Carlos Jesus Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Baker v. City of Madison, Alabama et al
as 5:2021cv00382
Defendant:
Dion Hose, City of Madison, Alabama and Daniel Nunez
Plaintiff:
Curtis Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00921
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00907
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Silva et al v. Dale et al
as 6:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Leone Silva, Ernesto Anacleto, Jose Hernandez and others
Defendant:
RD and S Communications Resources LLC, Graycliff Enterprises Inc and Robert Dale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nunez v. Golden Rule Realty et al
as 5:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Golden Rule Realty, Huntsville Police Department, Scott Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Don Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Vance et al
as 2:2016cv08065
Petitioner:
Pedro Nunez Contreras
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
