Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ball v. McCollough et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jim Henry Ball, Jr.
Defendant:
R. McCollough , Steward Bradford , Social Worker Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tunstall-Bey v. Smith et al
as 5:2015ct03334
Plaintiff:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey
Defendant:
Paula Yvonne Smith, Carmen Hendricks, Letitia Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broach v. Thomas et al
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tony Curtis Broach
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, C. Stewart, Corizon Medical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick v. Hooks et al
as 3:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Dante Germaine Fredrick
Defendant:
Brad Hooks, Paula Duncan, Nurse Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swann v. Brubaker APN/NP et al
as 3:2014cv01889
Plaintiff:
Terrance D Swann
Defendant:
Barbara A Brubaker APN/NP, Nurse Moore NP, Nurse Bigheart NP and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shull v. Doctor Santos et al
as 3:2014cv00635
Plaintiff:
Shelby Kenneth Shull, III
Defendant:
Doctor Santos, Nurse Moore, Sergeant John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Searcy Hospital et al
as 1:2012cv00605
Plaintiff:
Daryl Craig Cooley, Jr.
Defendant:
Searcy Hospital, Nurse Moore and Mr. Cesour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Dart et al
as 1:2008cv05539
Plaintiff:
Dreran Craig
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Jail, Cook County Dept. Of Corr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gantt v. Bennett et al
as 5:2007ct03045
Plaintiff:
George W. Gantt
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Paula Y. Smith, Robert Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis v. Moore et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00047
Plaintiff:
Thomas Andrew Hollis
Defendant:
Nurse Moore, Dr. Mendez, Dr. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
