Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Johnson v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv03187
Plaintiff:
Jamal Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Williams, C/O Little and C/O Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Little et al
as 3:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Terrance Davis
Defendant:
C/O Little, C/O Searl, C/O Cob and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
Charles O Little
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc. , Biomet Manufacturing Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burgess v. Little et al
as 3:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Burgess
Defendant:
O. Little , R. Abangan , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fable Adams v. E.M.C.F., et al
as 16-60274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FABLE NATHAN ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
O. LITTLE, Employee in Medical Department at EMCF and DOCTOR CARL REDDIX, Managing Supervisor of Health Assurance
Merlin Hill v. Michael Walker, et al
as 15-60327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERLIN DANCEY HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WALKER, Case Manager at East Mississippi Correctional Facility, J. BUSCHER, Warden at East Mississippi Correctional Facility, D. SMITH, Major at East Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Smith v. Buscher et al
as 3:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Johnny B. Smith
Defendant:
O. Little, J. Buscher, D. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Brusher et al
as 3:2014cv00576
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
J. Brusher , H. Hollie , R. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Barnes et al
as 2:2014cv12378
Plaintiff:
Bill O Little
Defendant:
William J Barnes and Bryce Mike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. E.M.C.F et al
as 3:2014cv00339
Plaintiff:
Fable Nathan Adams
Defendant:
E.M.C.F, MTC, Derrick Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
