Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Woods v. Investment Realty Advisons
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Terryett O. Woods
Defendant:
Investment Realty Advisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Woods v. Store Front/ Valley Behavioral Health
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Terryett O. Woods
Defendant:
Store Front/ Valley Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fletcher v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Warden R. Brown, c/o Captain D. Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Neace v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Richard M Neace and Richard M. Neace
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., unknown Silvernal, Larry O. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Hughs et al
as 3:2023cv02599
Plaintiff:
Barnett William Bass, IV
Defendant:
Latoya Hughs, Rob Jefferies, Wexford Health Care Sources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byron O. Woods Sr. v. David Slayton et al
as 5:2023cv01397
Plaintiff:
Byron O Woods, Sr
Defendant:
David Slayton, Clerk of Court, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Dyer et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
James E. Scott
Defendant:
Dyer, Sheriff Joe Lombardo, State of Nevada Ex Rel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byron Woods, Sr. v. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angele, et al
as 22-55611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BYRON O. WOODS, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and SHERRI R. CARTER, Esquire
Neace v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00681
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Neace
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Warden Dave Bobby, Unit Manager fnu Silvernal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
