Cases 1 - 10 of 17
SINKUS v. COX et al
as 2:2022cv04584
Plaintiff:
BETH SINKUS
Defendant:
MINDI COX and O.C. TANNER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
N.G. et al v. INSTANT BRANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00754
Plaintiff:
N.G., BRITTANY GONZALEZ and O.C. a minor
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS, INC. and TARGET CORPORATION doing business as TARGET STORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jason Parker v. Darnell Gregory, et al
as 16-3141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DARNELL GREGORY, DIRECTOR, MR., CLEVELAND, MR. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ROBINSON, O.C. SUPERVISOR MS. and others
STEWART v. AKRON GASKET & PACKING ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv60164
Plaintiff:
COREY STEWART
Defendant:
AKRON GASKET & PACKING ENTERPRISES, INC., AMTROL, INC., ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORETTI v. O.C.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2012cv01078
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MORETTI
Defendant:
O.C.D.O.C., WARDEN HUTLER and O.C. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAMPE v. O.C.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2012cv01076
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY KAMPE
Defendant:
O.C.D.O.C., WARDEN HUTLER and O.C. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KILMARTIN v. O.C.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2012cv01080
Plaintiff:
STAN J. KILMARTIN
Defendant:
O.C.D.O.C., WARDEN HUTLER and O.C. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEENEY v. O.C.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2012cv01077
Plaintiff:
SEAN K SWEENEY
Defendant:
O.C.D.O.C., WARDEN HUTLER and O.C. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIBBERD v. O.C.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2012cv01079
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HIBBERD
Defendant:
O.C.D.O.C., WARDEN HUTLER and O.C. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SICURELLA et al v. O.C.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2011cv06717
Plaintiff:
LEONARD P. SICURELLA, JEFFREY KAMPE, SEAN K SWEENEY and others
Defendant:
O.C.D.O.C., WARDEN HUTLER and O.C. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
