Cases 11 - 20 of 2,582
Daniel Ochoa v. The United States of America
as 2:2024cv03279
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ochoa
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
GALINDO v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv21384
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE SEBASTIAN OCHOA GALINDO
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Franco Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2305
Petitioner:
EDER JOSUE FRANCO RODRIGUEZ, ANA YADIRA VALENCIA OCHOA and NICOLE FRANCO VALENCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Toledo et al v. Palafox et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Emma Ochoa Toledo and Edgar Casahonda
Defendant:
Andrew Palafox, Francisco Serrano, Nogales, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ochoa-Giron v. Garland
as 24-1930
Petitioner:
ALLISON ITZAYANA OCHOA-GIRON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Young v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Young
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber K. Ochoa, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dimas v. Warner
as 1:2024cv03044
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ochoa Dimas
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Ismael Zarco Sanchez, Gabriel Arguelles, Hector Aquino and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
