Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 263
Moses v. Odum
as 4:2023cv00110
Petitioner: Antonio Leon Moses
Respondent: Ray Odum
Not Classified By Court: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. ODUM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00029
Plaintiff: Quantovia Robinson
Defendant: Mr. Odum, Ms. Jones, Mr. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Odum et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00028
Plaintiff: John Hughes
Defendant: Warden Roy Odum, Warden Cox, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. ODUM et al
as 7:2023cv00046
Plaintiff: QUANTOVIA ROBINSON
Defendant: Warden ODUM, Warden JONES, Warden COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Cox et al
as 1:2023cv00991
Petitioner: Rashad Marquise Ballard
Respondent: Warden Cox, Jones and Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fedd v. Odum
as 5:2023cv00002
Plaintiff: Levi Arthur Fedd
Defendant: Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilpatrick v. Warden Odum
as 1:2022cv04927
Petitioner: Adrian Kilpatrick
Respondent: Warden Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Odum et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00071
Plaintiff: Solomon R. Bell
Defendant: Odum, Mr. Cox, Mr. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. Odum
as 1:2022cv03079
Plaintiff: Brent L. Arthur
Defendant: Mr. Odum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Odums v. Niblack et al
as 1:2022cv07230
Plaintiff: Marvin Odums
Defendant: Preston Niblack, Mark F. Schroeder and Ramkellawan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?