Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Edwards v. Williamson County Police et al
as 3:2026cv01506
Defendant:
John Doe 2-3, Officer Bennet, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Johnson v. Bennet
as 26-6969
Plaintiff:
RODERICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
OFFICER BENNET and OFFICER WOLFF
Hatcher v. Lingolb et al
as 3:2026cv00894
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
LT James Bryant Lingolb, Officer Bennet, Officer Jonathan K. Aikin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bennet et al
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Roderick Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Bennet and Officer Wolff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Banks v. Bennet et al
as 2:2023cv05994
Plaintiff:
Rodney Banks
Defendant:
Officer Bennet, Officer Sandoval, Officer Lorenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Banks v. Officer Bennet et al
as 2:2023cv03528
Plaintiff:
Rodney Banks
Defendant:
Officer Bennet, Officer Sandoval, Officer Lorenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Bennets
as 2:2021cv14273
Plaintiff:
Jesus Martin Soto
Defendant:
Officer Bennets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIDDLEBROOKS v. NARDELLI et al
as 1:2021cv12497
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BENNET, ADMINISTRATOR ERIN NARDELLI and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LOCKE
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MIDDLEBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Bennet et al
as 3:2013cv00688
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Officer Bennet and U.C.I. Security Correctional Officers, of U.C.I. Mental Health Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. U.C.I. Security et al
as 3:2013cv00627
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
U.C.I. Security, Officer Bennet and Officer Browney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
