Cases 1 - 10 of 26
SETTS v. A UNKNOWN NAME et al
as 4:2026cv00230
Plaintiff:
BURT LEON SETTS
Defendant:
A UNKNOWN NAME, FEMALE DEPUTY, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Taylor v. Stokes
as 25-1641
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LEE TAYLOR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER STOKES, in his individual and official capacity
ANDERSON v. KING et al
as 1:2025cv02142
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ANDERSON
Defendant:
COLLEEN KING, PATRICK NOGAN, OFFICER STOKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv02545
Defendant:
K. Stuart, Officer Swisser, Anthony Wills and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. LANE et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT LANE, HARRIS, T WYATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahone v. Cope et al
as 3:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mahone
Defendant:
Sgt. Cope, Officer Carnona, Officer Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitley v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv11995
Plaintiff:
PR of Est. Edna Whitley
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gregory Skipper, George Whitinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benita Williams v. Annette Smith, et al
as 21-3320
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. [UNKNOWN] MONEY, K. RIEHLE, INTERESTED PARTY STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENITA WILLIAMS
Benita Williams v. Annette Smith, et al
as 21-3189
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. [UNKNOWN] MONEY, K. RIEHLE, INTERESTED PARTY STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENITA WILLIAMS
Rankin Bey v. Brown et al
as 5:2021ct03005
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
N.C. Dept. of Public Safety, Judy Brown, Correctional Officer Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
