Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MICHAEL OLIVAREZ v. Meta Platforms, Inc. fka Facebook, inc. et al
as 4:2026cv12745
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC, Google LLC, TikTok, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OLIVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07871
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09169
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Munoz v. Cabrera et al
as 7:2026cv00481
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Munoz
Defendant:
Martin Cabrera, Texas City of Falfurrias, San Juanita Olivarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Croft v. Surovics
as 26-50850
Plaintiff:
Bradley Lane Croft
Defendant:
Gregory Surovics, Thomas McHugh, Fred Olivarez and others
Olivarez v. Federal Express Corporation
as 6:2026cv00619
Plaintiff:
Franky Olivarez
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Olivarez v. Rivera Case transferred to the Southern District of Texas - Corpus Christi Division.
as 4:2026cv06033
Petitioner:
Pedro Santos Olivarez
Respondent:
Oscar Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Olivarez v. Rivera
as 2:2026cv00224
Petitioner:
Pedro Santos Olivarez
Respondent:
Oscar Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
