Cases 1 - 10 of 22,498
985 Mt. Zion LLC et al v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
985 Mt. Zion LLC, Pineview and Renters Reference Services Inc.
Defendant:
Priscilla Oliver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Proffitt v. G M R I Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Teresa Proffitt
Defendant:
G M R I Inc on behalf of Darden Restaurants doing business as Olive Garden #4418 and Olive Garden Holdings L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oliver v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv05148
Plaintiff:
Jazzmyn Troi Oliver
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
McPherson v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mastrom v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Mastrom
Defendant:
Jr. Robert Adams
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01486
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Oliver
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Oliver v. AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Oliver
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Mohamed v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Gavin Thomas Mohamed
Defendant:
Ronald C Heeg, LaPorte County, Steve Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
