Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Owen v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2023cv80901
Petitioner:
Duane Eugene Owen
Respondent:
Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Sigmon et al v. Stirling et al
as 3:2021cv01651
Plaintiff:
Brad Keith Sigmon and Freddie E Owens
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Bryan P. Stirling
Intervenor Defendant:
Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Arrington v. Warden
as 1:2017cv00022
Petitioner:
Robert Owen Arrington
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Owens v. Stirling et al
as 0:2016cv02512
Petitioner:
Freddie Owens
Respondent:
Bryan P Stirling and Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lisle v. Sandoval, et al.
as 2:2015cv00351
Respondent:
Renee Baker, Catherine Cortez Masto, Greg Cox and others
Petitioner:
Kevin James Lisle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Waldrip v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv02119
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Waldrip
Respondent:
Brian Owens , Bruce Chatman and Other Unknown Employees and Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wellons v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv01884
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Wellons
Defendant:
Brian Owens and Bruce Chatman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wellons v. Owens et al
as 1:2014cv01827
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Wellons
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Bruce Chatman and Other Unknown Employees and Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edgar Tamayo v. Rick Perry, et al
as 14-70003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDGAR ARIAS TAMAYO
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK PERRY, Governor, RISSIE OWENS, Chairwoman of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, ROMULO CHAVEZ, Board Member and others
Eric Mann v. Charles Ryan
as 09-99017
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC OWEN MANN
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
