Cases 51 - 60 of 81
United States of Americav. $29,060.63 in United States currency seized from account number CA2-158011 in the name of Teresa Brown and Martin Brown at J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Columbus, Ohio et al
as 4:2010cv01042
Defendant:
$29,060.63 in United States currency seized from account number CA2-158011 in the name of Teresa Brown and Martin Brown at J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Columbus, Ohio, $3,860.25 in United States currency seized from account number 8302716212 in the name of Windsong Ventures, LLC., at Bank of Colorado, Fort Lupton, Colorado, $53,232.78 in United States currency seized from account number 457018209174 in the name of Uniti Capital Corporation at Bank of America, Seattle, Washington and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Real Property Known And Numbered As 302 Avondale Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, With All Improvements, Appurtenances, And Attachemnts Thereon.
as 2:2010cv00939
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Known And Numbered As 302 Avondale Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, With All Improvements, Appurtenances, And Attachemnts Thereon.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. Real Property Known and Numbered As 1500 E. Kenmore Road, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, With All Improvements, Appurtenances, and Attachments Thereon, (Record Owner Armando Campa)
as 2:2010cv00938
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Known and Numbered As 1500 E. Kenmore Road, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, With All Improvements, Appurtenances, and Attachments Thereon, (Record Owner Armando Campa)
Movant:
Armando Campa, Rigoberto Gomez Gomez and Manuel Gomez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
US v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 10-2154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Petitioner:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant:
TERENCE PATRICK MCLAUGHLIN, GEORGE CHEMALI and CLP, INCORPORATED
United States of America et al v. Ohio Art Company
as 3:2010cv01678
Plaintiff:
United States of America and FLFMC, LLC.
Defendant:
Ohio Art Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
United States of America v. 715/721 Woodland, Warren Ohio et al
as 4:2010cv01348
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
715/721 Woodland, Warren Ohio, 1608 Mahoning Avenue, N.W., Warren Ohio, 322 North Street, N.W., Warren Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property Known and Numbered as 8523 Gosling Way, Powell, Delaware County, Ohio
as 2:2010cv00413
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Known and Numbered as 8523 Gosling Way, Powell, Delaware County, Ohio
Movant:
Qiang Bi and Meiling Tang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Real Property Known and Numbered as 52 North Rodgers Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, et al
as 2:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Known and Numbered as 52 North Rodgers Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio,, Real Property Known and Numbered as 1501 thomas Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, Real Property Known and Numbered as 300 Cypress Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property known as 1641-1647 Dietzen Avenue, Dayton, Ohio 45408
as 3:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property known as 1641-1647 Dietzen Avenue, Dayton, Ohio 45408
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. OHIO ART COMPANY
as 2:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FLFMC, LLC. and others
Defendant:
OHIO ART COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
