Cases 31 - 40 of 104
MENDOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46250
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
OSCAR MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Katheryn Limas v. Oscar Mendoza et al
as 2:2020cv01573
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10 Inclusive, Oscar Mendoza and Denise Mendoza
Plaintiff:
Katheryn Limas
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
MENDOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00366
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
OSCAR MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv00213
Plaintiff:
Luther Karl Ferguson
Defendant:
Troy D Simpson, Leisha Kizzee, Patricia Demerica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Collier et al
as 1:2019cv00517
Defendant:
Vickie Barrow, Felipe Gonzalez, Jr, Darren Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWERS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02957
Plaintiff:
WILSON OSPINA, DAVID HAUGHTON, JAOOD WALLACE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Powers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01972
Plaintiff:
Wilson Ospina, David Haughton, Jaood Wallace and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Saldana v. Collier et al
as 1:2019cv00738
Defendant:
Oscar . Mendoza, Lorie Davis, Debra Gibbs and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ricardo Saldana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheron Terrell v. TX Board of Criminal Justice, et al
as 19-40329
Defendant / Appellee:
OSCAR MENDOZA, SHIRLEY GRIFFIN, TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND ITS BOARD MEMBERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERON GABRIEL TERRELL
Pipkin v. Collier et al
as 4:2019cv00949
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza and Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Michael Pipkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
