Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Miller v. Travelers Indemnity Co of Connecticut et al
as 5:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Kelcey Miller
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut, Oscar Lopez and Hermann Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Ramirez-Alvarado
as 24-20020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerardo Ramirez-Alvarado, also known as Oscar Lopez, also known as Carlos Hernandez Albarado, also known as Alejandro Hernandez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez Gonalez v. Garland
as 23-3508
Petitioner:
OSCAR LOPEZ GONALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Scott v. Saginaw et al
as 1:2023cv11892
Plaintiff:
Rae'Quin R Scott
Defendant:
City of Saginaw, Jonathan Beyerlein, Julian Guevara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps v. Saginaw, City of et al
as 1:2023cv11020
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Phelps
Defendant:
Saginaw, City of, Fraternal Order of Police Associates, Ray Janni Lodge, Inc., Vincent Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Oscar Lopez-Soto
as 21-10263
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
OSCAR LOPEZ-SOTO
Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv05656
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lopez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
