Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Montgomery v. Otis Worldwide Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
TANYA M. MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION and KEVIN B. LORUSSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Magana v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Alma Magana
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company, Otis Elevator, LLC, Otis Worldwide Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Peguese v. Otis Worldwide Corporation
as 3:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
Markia Peguese
Defendant:
Otis Worldwide Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
CYNTHIA PROITE v. OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv04575
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA PROITE
Defendant:
OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION doing business as OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and JOHN DOES, INC. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HOLDEN v. OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv02203
Plaintiff:
PAMELA HOLDEN
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Darnis et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv01171
Defendant:
John H. Walker, Carrier Global Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Maurer, Christopher Doot, David Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
