Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Williams v. Jones et al
as 8:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Rackim Lavan Williams
Defendant:
P Jones , A Wilson , H Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENRY v. CFCF/PHILADELPHIA PRISONS SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv07411
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. HENRY
Defendant:
CFCF/PHILADELPHIA PRISONS SYSTEM, DELANEY, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. FULWOOD
as 1:2011cv01911
Plaintiff:
MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, L. JENKINS, PAUL HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Harris v. John Adams, et al
as 11-2310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ADAMS, Lieutenant, ROBERT TENUTA, Sergeant, CHARLES SCOTT, Nurse and others
Defendant:
FERNANDO FRONTERA, Doctor
Senator v. Cates et al
as 2:2011cv02029
Plaintiff:
Bruce Senator
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, Robin Dezember, D. Foston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Wang et al
as 7:2011cv00271
Defendant:
Dr. Bob Behnke, Ms. K. Carter, Ms. J. Cobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julian Rochester v. Mark Sanford, et al
as 11-35430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK SANFORD, NIKKI HALEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Rochester v. Sanford et al
as 3:2011cv00471
Defendant:
Abston, Nikkie Haley, Eric Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Dr. L. Wang et al
as 7:2010cv00476
Defendant:
Dr. Bob Behnke, Dr. L. Dobransky, Dr. L. Wang and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Dr. L. Wang et al
as 1:2010cv01178
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Defendant:
Dr. L. Wang, Ms. C. Mayes, Dr. L. Dobransky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
