Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska v. Daniel Cameron, et al
as 22-5832
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients
Intervenor / Appellee: EMW WOMEN'S SURGICAL CENTER, P.S.C. and ERNEST MARSHALL, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL J. CAMERON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Defendant: ERIC FRIEDLANDER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Kentucky's Cabinet for Health and Family Services, MICHAEL S. RODMAN, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS B. WINE, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the 30th Judicial Circuit of Kentucky
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00450
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, et al v. Daniel Cameron, et al
as 22-5451
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL J. CAMERON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Defendant: ERIC FRIEDLANDER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Kentucky's Cabinet for Health and Family Services, MICHAEL S. RODMAN, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS B. WINE, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the 30th Judicial Circuit of Kentucky
Intervenor / Appellee: EMW WOMEN'S SURGICAL CENTER, P.S.C. and ERNEST MARSHALL, M.D.
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. v. Cameron et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00198
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.
Defendant: Daniel Cameron, Eric Friedlander, Michael S. Rodman and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. and Ernest Marshall, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00562
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00116
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. et al v. Glisson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00189
Plaintiff: EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. and Ernest Marshall, M.D.
Defendant: Vicky Yates Brown Glisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Placke v. Grants Lick Veterinary Hospital, P.S.C.
as 2:2015cv00223
Defendant: Grants Lick Veterinary Hospital, P.S.C.
Plaintiff: Loretta Placke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Jimenez-Tapia, et al v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, et al
as 17-1085
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE M. ALBANDOZ-RODRIGUEZ, DIOMEDES JIMENEZ-TAPIA and EURIPIDES DEL VILLAR-ROSARIO
Defendant - Appellee: FIDDLER GONZALEZ & RODRIGUEZ, P.S.C., a Puerto Rico Corporation, IGNACIO JOSE GORRIN-MALDONADO, individually and as Officer of Fiddler Gonzalez and Rodriguez Division, SILVIA EGURROLA ALONSO, individually and as C.E.O Officer of Fiddler Gonzalez and Rodriguez , Administrative Division and others
EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. et al v. Beshear et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00016
Plaintiff: EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. , Ernest Marshall, M.D. , Ashley Bergin, M.D. and others
Defendant: Andrew G. Beshear , Vicky Yates Brown Glisson and Michael S. Rodman
Movant: Robert Stivers , Jeff Hoover , Whitney Westerfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?