Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Tennessee Machining, LLC v. PACCAR, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Machining, LLC
Defendant:
PACCAR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peterbilt of Massachusetts, LLC v. Peterbilt Motors Company, a Division of PACCAR Inc.
as 1:2017cv12582
Plaintiff:
Peterbilt of Massachusetts, LLC
Defendant:
Peterbilt Motors Company, a Division of PACCAR Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J. SUPOR & SON TRUCKING & RIGGING COMPANY, INC. v. KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY, A DIVISION OF PACCAR INC et al
as 2:2017cv08057
Plaintiff:
J. SUPOR & SON TRUCKING & RIGGING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY, A DIVISION OF PACCAR INC , PACCAR INC. , COOPERSBURG KENWORTH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stampfli, Lance v. Paccar, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00751
Plaintiff:
Lance Michael Stampfli
Defendant:
Paccar, Inc. and Wisconsin Kenworth LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kerkhoff Cattle Co., Inc. v. Sioux City Truck Sales, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv00474
Plaintiff:
Kerkhoff Cattle Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Sioux City Truck Sales, Inc, PACCAR, Inc. and Sioux City Truck Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leonardo Gonzalez Lopez v. Rush Truck Centers of California, Inc.
as 5:2016cv02178
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Gonzalez Lopez
Defendant:
Paccar, Inc. and Rush Truck Centers of California, Inc.
Unknown:
Gina E Och and Gina E Och
Ranjit Singh v. Paccar Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv02011
Defendant:
Cummins Inc., Does, Inland Kenworth US Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ranjit Singh
Ranjit Singh v. Paccar Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07035
Defendant:
Cummins Inc., Does, Inland Kenworth US Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ranjit Singh
Abel Barajas v. Paccar, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07038
Plaintiff:
Abel Barajas
Defendant:
Cummins, Inc., Does, Inland Kenworth US Inc. and others
Abel Barajas v. Paccar, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv02002
Plaintiff:
Abel Barajas
Defendant:
Cummins, Inc., Does, Inland Kenworth US Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
