Cases 1 - 10 of 2,572
PAIGE v. DIGITAL BUSINESS NETWORKS ALLIANCE, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv03169
Defendant:
DIGITAL BUSINESS NETWORKS ALLIANCE, LLC, OFS PORTAL, LLC, MCGINNIS LOCHRIDGE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELE PAIGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Rustemeyer v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65366
Plaintiff:
Allison Paige Rustemeyer
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) McCaa v. FCI-Herlong et al
as 2:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Cedriguez McCaa
Defendant:
FCI-Herlong, S. Salmonson, Haggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Bowen v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Paige Bowen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Donald v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv03144
Plaintiff:
Clairmont Donald
Defendant:
Superintendent Stacie Bennett, P. Paige-Connier, Dr. Mikhail Gusman, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Im v. Paige
as 2:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Hye K Im
Defendant:
Shaquille Paige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Paige Elizabeth Peterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kirstyn Bashaw v. Majestic Care of Whitehall, LLC
as 24-3292
Plaintiff:
KIRSTYN PAIGE BASHAW
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE OF WHITEHALL, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
