Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bayne et al v. Asset Retrieval & Investigations, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02456
Plaintiff:
Laura J. Bayne and Brett H. Bayne
Defendant:
Asset Retrieval & Investigations, LLC, Pamela Smith, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00138
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Therl Taylor v. John Pate
as 17-6375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERL TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PATE, RANDALL WILLIAMS, TERESA RAMSEY and others
Therl Taylor v. Walter Worrick
as 17-6376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERL TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER WORRICK, VIRGINIA GRUBBS, PAMELA SMITH and others
Sutasinee Thana v. Board of License Commissioners
as 17-1192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUTASINEE THANA, MICHAEL JAMES LOHMAN and THAI SEAFOOD & GRILL, INCORPORATED, trading as Thai Palace & Thai Palace & Lounge
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF LICENSE COMMISSIONERS FOR CHARLES COUNTY, MARYLAND, PAMELA SMITH, Chair, GUY BLACK, Member and others
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11725
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Worrick et al
as 2:2016cv03084
Plaintiff:
Therl Taylor
Defendant:
Walter Worrick, Virginia Grubbs, Pamela Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Pate et al
as 2:2016cv02115
Plaintiff:
Therl Taylor
Defendant:
John Pate, Randall Williams, Teresa Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15148
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blair v. Smith et al
as 1:2015cv01278
Plaintiff:
Santee J. Blair
Defendant:
Pamela Smith, A. Smith, LPN Bonney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
