Cases 1 - 10 of 85
WADE v. C.O. CARTER et al
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
PAUL ALEXANDER WADE, 3RD
Defendant:
C.O. CARTER, C.O. PEEPLES and C.O. SHEPERD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Paul Alexander
as 24-6032
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAUL ALEXANDER, a/k/a David Paul Hayes, a/k/a Shorty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Serrano v. McConell Unit
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Paul Alexander Serrano
Defendant:
McConell Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serrano v. McConell Unit
as 4:2023cv03982
Plaintiff:
Paul Alexander Serrano
Defendant:
McConell Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ST CLAIR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13666
Plaintiff:
JOHNN-PAUL ALEXANDER ST CLAIR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KNOX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11410
Plaintiff:
PAUL ALEXANDER KNOX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
PAUL ALEXANDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Timonin et al v. Wright et al
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Paul Alexander Timonin and Alexander Philip Timonin
Defendant:
Constable Wright, Constable Huynh, Constable Armstrong-Woodland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Gude v. USA
as 1:2023cv01875
Plaintiff:
Brian-Paul Alexander Gude
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
