Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Clements v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv05677
Petitioner:
Jon Paul Clements
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Orosco v. Napolitano, et al
as 09-40004
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONAL PORFIRIO ORDONE OROSCO
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, EDUARDO LOZANO, Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officer and others
David Kissi v. Paul Clement
as 08-8366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL CLEMENT, et al, SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, U.S., PETER J. MESSITTE, Judge and others
David Kissi v. Paul Clement
as 08-8281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL CLEMENT, U.S. Solicitor General, U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, CHRISTY BARRERA, U.S. Small Business Administration and others
David Kissi v. Paul Clement
as 08-8272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL CLEMENT, U.S. Solicitor General, PETER J. MESSITTE and MRS. MESSITTE
Kissi v. Clement et al
as 1:2008cv01135
Petitioner:
David Kissi
Respondent:
Paul Clement, Harley Lappin, D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kissi v. Clement et al
as 1:2008cv01134
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Paul Clement, J. Shartle, J. Muralecle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-4382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kissi v. Clement et al
as 8:2008cv02447
Defendant:
Paul Clement, Peter J. Messitte and Messitte
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kissi v. Clement et al
as 8:2008cv02273
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Paul Clement, U.S. Solicitor General, Peter J. Messitte and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
