Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Howard v. Ellis Moving and Storage, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Paxton Howard
Defendant:
Ellis Moving and Storage, LLC and Nick Goins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reeser v. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Whitney Paxton and Jeff Reeser
Defendant:
Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc , Phillip Hicks and Todd Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nguyen et al v. Portable Product Services, LP
as 4:2013cv00880
Plaintiff:
Thuy Uyen Nguyen , Trang Vy Tuong , Phong Phuoc Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Portable Product Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
MURRAY v. GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORP. et al
as 3:2011cv00647
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MURRAY, MARK ZIMMERMAN, MARK LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tito Jackson v. Alpharma Inc
as 10-3531
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TITO JACKSON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JOANN PRESBITERO, JULIE ANDERSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ALPHARMA INC
Marcus Abbe, et al v. City of San Diego, California
as 09-56437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS R. ABBE, THOMAS E. ABBOTT, Jr., DAVID G. ABRAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
Piontek v. American Lenders Service Company et al
as 1:2008cv01522
Plaintiff:
Vicki Piontek
Defendant:
American Lenders Service Company, American Lenders Service Company of Harrisburg and Brett Paxton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paxton v. Morrow's Incorporated et al
as 8:2008cv00189
Plaintiff:
Karen Paxton
Defendant:
Morrow's Incorporated and Chris D. Tarrant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Paxton et al v. City of Eldora et al
as 1:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ted Paxton, Edward Lepley, Paul Scally and others
Defendant:
City of Eldora and Robert Jeske
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
