Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
WRIGHT v. BROUGHTON et al
as 4:2026cv00270
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WRIGHT, ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III and PERRY ELLIS
Defendant:
JOSEPH BROUGHTON, WEBSTER BIVENS, MARK E WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv22693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv62139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ellis v. Fitz
as 2:2025cv02372
Petitioner:
Ronald Perry Ellis
Respondent:
Warden Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Perry Ellis International, Inc.
as 1:2025cv21445
Plaintiff:
Julio Martinez
Defendant:
Perry Ellis International, Inc. doing business as Perry Ellis
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
PEI Licensing, LLC, et al v. ESTAR (2018) LIMITED
as 1:2025cv20462
Plaintiff:
PEI Licensing, LLC, and Perry Ellis International Europe Limited
Defendant:
ESTAR (2018) LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ellis v. Selene Finance LP et al
as 3:2024cv02169
Defendant:
Barings LLC, Barings Finance LLC, Selene Finance LP and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
