Cases 1 - 10 of 30
DOE 1 et al v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and JOHN DOE 3
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., WILLIAM L. LASSITER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Brown v. Tegtmeyer et al
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Marr Peter Brown and Marr Brown
Defendant:
Stephen Tegtmeyer, Malak B Heiny, Donald C Swanson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Parkview Regional Medical Center
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Marr Peter Brown and Marr Brown
Defendant:
Parkview Regional Medical Center, Dustin J. Petersen, Tariq M Lescouflair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2022cv00148
Petitioner:
Marr Peter Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00422
Petitioner:
Marr Peter Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 1:2020cv02269
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
PETER BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Fox
as 2:2016cv02285
Petitioner:
Peter Brown
Respondent:
Robert W Fox and Edward G. Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Fox
as 1:2016cv01413
Petitioner:
Peter Brown
Respondent:
Robert W Fox and Edward G. Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peter Brown et al v. Robert W Fox
as 2:2016cv06090
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Governor Edward G. Brown, Jr
Petitioner:
Peter Brown
Respondent:
Robert W Fox
Birrell, et al., v. Fox, et al.,
as 2:2016cv01818
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Birrell , Raymond D. Jackson, Sr. , Sidney Ross Deegan, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Robert W. Fox, Joseph A. Bick, M. Cordero-Boucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
