Cases 11 - 20 of 229
PETTY et al v. MOTORISTS COMMERCIAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Petty and Kelly A. Petty
Defendant:
Motorists Commercial Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pettis v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03231
Plaintiff:
Carlinda Pettis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lara v. George et al
as 1:2023cv03191
Plaintiff:
Martha Lara
Defendant:
Kimberly George, Amy Olivia, Kanisha Pettis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kevin Pettis v. USA
as 23-1889
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN PETTIS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pettis v. Bruce et al
as 2:2023cv02069
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pettis
Defendant:
Colin Stirling Bruce and Eugene Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adair v. Moreland et al
as 1:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adair
Defendant:
. Moreland, . Petty, . Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petty v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq02943
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Sherlene Petty
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
3C, LLC d/b/a 3CHI v. PETTY
as 1:2022cv01729
Plaintiff:
3C, LLC d/b/a 3CHI
Defendant:
Robyn Gail Petty
BOYD v. CRICHFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
SHAVON TYVELL BOYD
Defendant:
SHELBY CRICHFIELD and PETTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.M. v. Indianapolis Public Schools, et al
as 22-2332
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A. M., by her mother and next friend, E.M.
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS and SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, in her official capacity
Intervenor:
STATE OF INDIANA
Amicus Curiae:
INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER, RILEY GAINES, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
