Cases 11 - 20 of 800
Kennedy v. Haskins et al
as 7:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Carl Ray Kennedy
Defendant:
Petra Haskins, Sgt James and Capt Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Petty
Defendant:
Dr Doe, Nurse Lory Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Matevousain et al
as 1:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Petty
Defendant:
Andre Matevousain, Andrew Ciolli, J. Sturgill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John v. Warden, Hernando County Detention Center (Hernando County)
as 8:2023cv02364
Petitioner:
Robert Petty John
Defendant:
Warden, Hernando County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Eslami v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Nathan Eslami
Defendant:
G. Matteson, T. Tyler, J. Cavagnolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Tisdale
as 23-50637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Alonzo Jones, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Roderick Tisdale, Officer, Jason Petty, Officer and Michael May, U.S. Marshal
CRUZ v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2023cv16879
Plaintiff:
RAMOS M. CRUZ
Defendant:
WARDEN, OFFICER PETTY, OFFICER J.C. DARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettie v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Cebon Wayne Pettie
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Trujillo v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Larry Trujillo
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, N. Malakka, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
